Monday 24 October 2016

Is urbanisation a blessing or a curse for sub-Saharan Africa?

The high rates of urbanisation in sub-Saharan Africa are being fuelled by rapid population growth and mass rural-to-urban migration. Although urbanisation is generally considered to be a universal driver of economic development, it is also recognised that most theories of economic development are based upon the historical development paths of ‘western’ societies and therefore do not necessarily apply to developing nations. There is little doubt however that urbanisation provides the means for increased economic and social development. Cities offer many opportunities for both rich and poor to increase their incomes, political influence and access to services such as education, health, and transport that are lacking in rural environments (WHO 2010). The agglomeration of people in urban centres is linked to structural adjustments in a nation’s economy from a low-income agrarian society to a higher income, industrial and service-based economy. As incomes rise and money becomes available for investment in urban infrastructure, the capacity for further economic and social development increases.

Urbanisation in sub-Saharan Africa has contributed to high levels of economic growth in recent decades (>5% between 2000 and 2010)(Barton and Leke 2016). Although Africa remains the most rural region on the planet, cities are playing an increasingly important role within the continent’s growing economy. Large cities such as Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, now account for significant proportions of their country’s GDP (17.5%) (NBS & RCO 2014), while the city of Lagos alone is the 7th largest economy in all of Africa – higher than that of countries such as Kenya and Angola (Kazeem 2016). The economic benefits of urbanisation are also being translated into social developments as service provision is substantially higher in cities than it is in rural areas. In 2015, approximately 87% of those living in urban areas in sub-Saharan Africa had access to “safe water” compared to 56% in rural areas (WHO/UNICEF 2015). 

However, economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa is slowing (~3% in 2016) and is currently lower than population growth (World Bank 2016). Sub-Saharan Africa is the only region in the world where rates of urbanisation are much higher than rates of economic growth (Molen 2014). Although there have been reductions in the incidence of extreme poverty in recent decades, it still remains high (43% in 2012) and overall economic growth has been much less able to reduce poverty in Africa than elsewhere in the world (World Bank 2016). The implications of this can be seen clearly in many of sub-Saharan Africa’s major cities. The proportion of the urban population living in slums is higher in sub-Saharan Africa than anywhere else in the world (>60%) while some countries such as Sierra Leone have more than 95% of their urban population living in slums (UN-HABITAT 2010). Those who most need it are not feeling the benefits of economic growth and the result is that many of Africa’s cities are being dubbed ‘oceans of poverty with small islands of wealth’ (UN-Habitat 2010 p12). 

As for water and sanitation provision in urban areas, there is evidence to suggest that this too is suffering to a greater extent compared to previous decades. Thompson et al. (2000) investigated changes in domestic water use between the 1960s and 1990s in rural and urban areas across East Africa. Their findings showed that while rural water supplies improved during the time period, urban water supplies showed signs of fatigue under the stresses of rapid population growth. Urban per capita water use fell by almost half between 1967 and 1997 due to the deterioration of piped water supplies, leading to an increased reliance upon expensive private water vendors. The increased unreliability of urban water supplies is suggested to have had a negative effect on hygiene, as less water is available for activities such as washing. 

There is little doubt that urbanisation is a necessary prerequisite for economic and social development in sub-Saharan Africa. The growth of cities has allowed many millions of people to have access to better economic opportunities and social services compared to those offered by traditional rural societies. However, the challenge exists where rates of urban population growth are so high that urban governance structures are unable to keep pace. Slums are an unfortunate product of this, however it is important that slum dwellers are not viewed as part of the problem. Acknowledging that these people represent resources rather than problems is critical if people-centred, sustainable urban development is to be achieved (UN-Habitat 2010).

5 comments:

  1. I think there's no straightforward answer as to whether it is a blessing or curse; rather it is a necessary stage within the development process. But if governed and managed properly with the right resources and schedule which they admittedly, currently lack, urbanization is a good tool to modernisation as well as economic growth

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes I agree, I think the challenge lies with controlling rates of urbanisation so that there might be some hope of expanding urban infrastructure at the same pace as urban population growth. At the moment, such high rates of urbanisation are threatening to undermine the benefits that urbanisation can bring about. One option governments have is to try and slow down rural-to-urban migration. Check out the article I have linked below, it is a very interesting paper that sets out a number of measures that governments can take to curb rural-to-urban migration.

      https://soapboxie.com/world-politics/GOVERNMENT-MEASURES-AIMED-AT-CURBING-RURAL-TO-URBAN-MIGRATION

      Delete
  2. Hi Freddy,

    I really enjoyed your blog post. I am left wondering what happens to people who stay in rural communities when rapid urbanization occurs? Is the promise of economic, social, and political success in urban centers at the expense of the people in surrounding rural areas, or do they simply miss out on the benefits? Are they worse off than before?

    I don't suggest I have the answers yet, but it is something you left me wondering. Thanks for sharing a thought provoking post.

    Best,

    Victoria

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Victoria,

      That is a very good question. From what I can gauge from the literature there are mixed reviews about the impacts of urbanisation on rural communities. Many studies suggest that urbanisation is increasing the inequalities between rural and urban communities. In one paper (linked below) biases in national and social policies towards urban development were blamed for sustaining rural poverty by excluding rural communities from development.

      However in another paper that looked at the impacts of rural-to-urban migration on a rural community in Nigeria, the opposite argument was put forward.

      This study found that rural-to-urban migration was contributing to economic and social development in the rural communities from which the migrants were leaving. This was due to most rural-urban migrants sending monthly remittances to their rural households in the form of food and money. In many cases these monthly remittances were more than the monthly wages of the rural households and were then being used to invest in education, new farming equipment and also for basic needs such as food.
      As well as this, the study also found that many rural-urban migrants had formed and were funding community projects that aimed to help the rural communities through the construction of roads, schools, water boreholes and in some cases through the funding of scholarships.

      So there does seem to be evidence for both sides of the argument. I suppose even in our society there are inequalities in things like transport, job opportunities and internet connection between rural and urban areas. I would say that urbanisation is probably necessary for the development of rural areas but that it takes some time for the economic and social gains made in the cities to trickle out to the countryside.

      http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/issues/issues26/
      https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijpr/2013/610193/#B36

      Delete
  3. Great to see these exchanges! I concur somewhat with first comment and think that this assertion "The agglomeration of people in urban centres is linked to structural adjustments in a nation’s economy from a low-income agrarian society to a higher income, industrial and service-based economy. As incomes rise and money becomes available for investment in urban infrastructure, the capacity for further economic and social development increases." needs to be challenged! It reads like a textbook suggestion of what has happened in high-income countries in the 19th and early 20th centuries - not Sub-Saharan Africa today.

    ReplyDelete